JPMorgan US Quality Factor ETF earns a High Process Pillar rating.
The main driver of the rating is that this fund tracks an index. Historical data, like Morningstar's Active/Passive Barometer, finds that passively managed funds have generally outperformed their active counterparts, especially over longer time horizons. The parent firm's impressive risk-adjusted performance, as shown by its average 10-year Morningstar Rating of 3.3 stars, also influences the rating. Strong risk-adjusted performance also supports the process, as shown by the fund's five-year alpha calculated relative to the category index, which suggests that the managers have shown skill in their allocation of risk.
This strategy skews toward smaller, higher-growth companies compared with its average peer in the Large Blend Morningstar Category. Analyzing additional factors, the fund has held stocks with higher trading volumes compared to Morningstar Category Peers in the past few years. More-liquid assets are easier to buy and sell without adversely moving their prices and tend to provide some ballast during market selloffs. They also are easier to sell to meet redemptions if a host of investors decide to leave the fund in a short period of time. In recent months, the strategy was more exposed to the Liquidity factor compared with its Morningstar Category peers as well. This strategy has also displayed a tendency to hold more companies with high dividend or buyback yields than peers over recent years. Higher-yield stocks can provide steady income, but also have their risks. Dividend payers may cut payouts, for instance, if their earnings fall. Compared with category peers, the strategy also had more exposure to the Yield factor in the most recent month. Additionally, the managers have consistently taken on more risk, demonstrated by higher volatility exposure than peers. This is a higher-risk, higher-reward approach. In this month, the strategy also had more exposure to the Volatility factor over its peers. More information on a fund and its respective category's factor exposure can be found in the Factor Profile module within the Portfolio section.
The portfolio is overweight in technology by 4.0 percentage points in terms of assets compared with the category average, and its consumer cyclical allocation is similar to the category. The sectors with low exposure compared to category peers are communication services and industrials, with communication services underweighting the average portfolio by 2.6 percentage points of assets and industrials similar to the average. The strategy owns 280 securities and its assets are more dispersed than peers in the category. In particular, 18.1% of the portfolio's assets are concentrated in the top 10 fund holdings, compared to the category’s 48.5% average. And finally, in terms of portfolio turnover, this fund trades less frequently than the category’s average, potentially limiting costs to investors.