Shell to Appeal a Court Order to Reduce Emissions

The court-ordered targets are well beyond Shell’s current plans of reducing carbon intensity by 20% in 2030 and moving to net zero by 2050.

Securities In This Article
Shell PLC ADR (Representing - Ordinary Shares)
(SHEL)

Ruling on a claim brought by a collection of environmental groups that Shell RDS.A has an obligation to contribute to the prevention of climate change through corporate policy, a Dutch District Court ordered on May 26 that Shell must reduce its CO2 emissions, including Scope 1, 2 and 3 by 45% by 2030 from 2019 levels. Shell asserted the complaint exceeded the lawmaking function of the court. The court disagreed and decided it could determine if Shell had a legal obligation to reduce emissions under Dutch civil code. Shell has already said it will appeal. Market reaction was muted with Shell shares trading slightly lower than peers on May 27. Our fair value estimate and moat rating are unchanged.

The court-ordered targets are well beyond Shell’s current plans of reducing carbon intensity by 20% in 2030 and moving to net zero by 2050. It is uncertain how Shell would actually achieve a 45% absolute reduction in emissions. Its current 2030 target is based on a reduction in carbon intensity, which can be achieved through a mix shift to lower-carbon energy and use of carbon offsets such as carbon capture or natural sinks. Intensity targets, which are a ratio of emissions/energy produced, are largely reliant on a greater portion of renewable energy in the portfolio and do not necessarily imply absolute emission reductions, although they likely would. Absolute emission reductions are more difficult to achieve, especially when Scope 3 emissions are included, given they comprise upward of 90% of total emissions from hydrocarbons. Also, oil companies have little, if any, control over Scope 3 emissions as these occur during combustion, well outside its operations. Outright divestment of oil and gas assets is really the only way to “reduce” these emissions. Divestment, however, merely shifts the associated emissions to another operator and has no net impact on global emissions.

Morningstar Premium Members gain exclusive access to our full analyst reports, including fair value estimates, bull and bear breakdowns, and risk analyses. Not a Premium Member? Get this and other reports immediately when you try Morningstar Premium free for 14 days.

More in Stocks

About the Author

Allen Good, CFA

Director
More from Author

Allen Good, CFA, is a director, Europe, for Morningstar*. Based in Amsterdam, he covers the oil and gas industries as well as manages a team of multi-industry analysts. He is also chair of the Morningstar Research Services Economic Moat Committee, a group of senior members of the equity research team responsible for reviewing all Economic Moat ratings issued by Morningstar. In this role, he is responsible for ensuring consistent application of Morningstar’s Economic Moat methodology across sectors and regions as well as updating and revising the methodology. His specialty is global integrated oils such as Exxon, Chevron and Shell and US independent refiners such as Valero and Marathon Petroleum. He also contributes to developing hydrocarbon price and petroleum product margin forecasts used in valuation models.

Before joining Morningstar in 2008, He performed merger and acquisition advisory work for a middle-market investment bank. Before that, he spent several years at Black & Decker in various operational roles, primarily focused on manufacturing and distribution.

Good holds a bachelor’s degree in business from the University of Tennessee and a master’s degree in business administration from Kenan-Flagler Business School at the University of North Carolina. He also holds the Chartered Financial Analyst® designation.

* Morningstar Holland BV (“Morningstar”) is a wholly owned subsidiary of Morningstar, Inc

Sponsor Center